WARNING: Pacific Law Center is a Fraud.
Go to 100FreeAttorneys.com for more information.
There are many parallels to the controversy over intentional wrongdoings by Pacific Law Center.
Prosecutors:
Pacific Law Center in San Diego, California which is owned by Phillips and Associates Law Firm in Arizona operates very much like a government office.
San Diego County Public Defenders Office is a government office. Every person that works for the San Diego County Public Defenders Office gets paid by a government check. We as tax payers pay for that office to operate, but we as tax payers do not have control of how much funding and support the San Diego Public Defenders Office gets. Compared to the funding and support that the San Diego County District Attorneys Office and the City of San Diego Attorneys Office it is insulting to the tax payer. Should the tax payer ever need to be represented by the San Diego County Public Defenders Office, that person will not get a fair defense due to lack of funding.
Pacific Law Center is private, and they spend over $10,000,000 a year on advertising, and Pacific Law Center has over 100 employees that get paid very well. If you look at the website of PacificLawCenter.com you will see that they only have 20 attorneys as of March 11, 2007 and some are supervisors that perhaps have even forgotten what a court room looks like. What do the other 80 employees do at Pacific Law Center? Pacific Law Center needs paralegals, investigators, a marketing department, janitors, delivery personals, limo drivers Etc...
It is a big overhead that Pacific Law Center has. Just like any business Pacific Law Center wants to save money. Operating Pacific Law Center like the San Diego County Public Defenders Office can save alot of money.
What does the San Diego County Public Defenders Office do so it can save money, while still representing the tax payer? Make deals with the prosecutor(s). It is always ONLY the prosecutors that offer the deals to the San Diego County Public Defenders Office and to any other defense attorney(s).
This is where corruption can be suggested. Why would a person hire Pacific Law Center when it can get the same results as if the accused was being represented by the San Diego County Public Defenders Office? Heavy marketing by Pacific Law Center is the reason. Misleading the public that they Pacific Law Center will get you better results from just about any other defense attorney in the State of California as a whole. This is called fraud.
The San Diego County District Attorneys Office has a fraud investigation unit which I know that they are very good at what they do, and I personally thank them for their efforts of protecting us regardless of race or gender.
The San Diego County District Attorneys Office has over 1,000 employees, and more than 250 of them are attorneys, and more than 100 of them are investigators. Because of better pay, and only because of better pay 14 investigators from the San Diego Police Department went to work for the San Diego District Attorneys Office.
San Diego County government as a whole is and has been having major problems with money due to frauds which we all see on the media. Where does the San Diego District Attorneys Office get the funds to hire 14 additional investigators when the San Diego Police Department has a difficult time with funds?
When a deal is made on a criminal matter it saves all parties money, except the defendant. If the defendant is being represented by Pacific Law Center then there is no refund on a retainer (contract). This is a major hustle that brings in alot of money, and this is called fraud.
So why wont the San Diego District Attorneys Office stop this hustle (fraud)? The motive is when Pacific Law Center talks its clients into taking just about all deals offered by the San Diego County District Attorneys Office ALL parties save money except the defendant.
If the defendant wants to take his/her criminal case to trial all parties turn their backs on the defendant, that includes Pacific Law Center and the San Diego County Public Defenders Office in a manner that is called being railroaded in jail or prison, and this is called fraud, and violations of so many things that is related to human rights violations.
Please visit: http://www.100FreeAttorneys.com
Pacific Law Center et al v. Saadat-Nejad
| Plaintiffs: | Pacific Law Center and Solomon Ward Seidenwurm and Smith LLP |
|---|---|
| Defendants: | Shahrokh Saadat-Nejad |
| Amicus: | San Diego ACLU |
| Case Number: | 3:2007cv00460 |
| Filed: | March 13, 2007 |
| Court: | California Southern District Court |
| Office: | San Diego Office [ Court Info ] |
| County: | San Diego |
| Presiding Judge: | Judge Larry Alan Burns |
| Presiding Judge: | Judge M. James Lorenz |
| Referring Judge: | Magistrate Judge Louisa S Porter |
| Nature of Suit: | Intellectual Property - Trademark |
| Cause: | 15:1051 Trademark Infringement |
| Jurisdiction: | Federal Question |
| Jury Demanded By: | Plaintiff |
| Amount Demanded: | $75,000.00 |
| Date Filed | # | Docket Text |
|---|---|---|
| March 13, 2007 | 1 | COMPLAINT against Shahrokh Saadat-Nejad (Filing fee $350./#135996) , filed by Pacific Law Center, Solomon Ward Seidenwurm and Smith LLP. (Attachments: # 1 Patent Letter) (Letter and copy of complaint mailed)(rxm) (Entered: March 14, 2007) |
| March 13, 2007 | 2 | Summons Issued as to Shahrokh Saadat-Nejad. (rxm) (Entered: March 14, 2007) |
| March 21, 2007 | 3 | Ex Parte MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Solomon Ward and by Pacific Law Center. (Attachments: # 1 Memo of Points and Authorities in Support of Motion# 2 Declaration of Thomas Slattery# 3 Declaration of Edward J. McIntyre)(McIntyre, Edward) (Entered: March 21, 2007) |
| March 22, 2007 | 4 | AFFIDAVIT of Service for Notice of Ex Parte Application, et al. Edward J. McIntyre personally served on Shahrokh Saadat-Nejad on March 22, 2007, filed by Pacific Law Center. (McIntyre, Edward) (Entered: March 22, 2007) |
| March 22, 2007 | 5 | Minute Entry: Judge M. James Lorenz recuses from this case and orders another judge assigned. Judge Larry Alan Burns randomly assigned. New case number 07cv0460-LAB(POR). (jsp) (Entered: 03/22/2007) |
| March 23, 2007 | 6 | ORDER Setting Briefing and Hearing on Plaintiffs' Application for Temporary Restraining Order 3 ; dft shall serve and file a memorandum responsive to plas' application no later than Monday, March 26, 2007 at 4:00pm; plas shall serve and file a reply memorandum no later than Wednesday, March 28, 2007 at noon; TRO Hearing set for 3/29/2007 10:00 AM in Courtroom 9 before Judge Larry Alan Burns; counsel for plas shall forthwith give dft telephonic notice of the contents of this Order and shall expeditiously effectuate service of same; Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 3/23/07. (kaj) (Entered: March 23, 2007) |
| March 23, 2007 | 7 | CERTIFICATE of Counsel re 6 Order Setting Hearing on Motion,, Declaration of Notice by Edward J McIntyre on behalf of all plaintiffs (McIntyre, Edward) (Entered: March 23, 2007) |
| March 27, 2007 | 8 | RESPONSE in Support re 3 Ex Parte MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Solomon Ward and Pacific Law Center filed by Pacific Law Center. (McIntyre, Edward) (Entered: March 27, 2007) |
| March 28, 2007 | 9 | Discrepancy Order by Judge Larry Alan Burns accepting document: Declaration of Shahrokh Saadat-Nejad and response to all ex parte in all court cases listed from Defendant Shahrokh Saadat-Nejad, non-compliance with local rule. No proof of service. Dft to file Proof of Service forthwith. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 3/27/2007. (jah) (Entered: March 28, 2007) |
| March 28, 2007 | 10 | DECLARATION of Shahrokh Saadat-Nejad and Response to All Ex Parte in All Court Cases Listed by Defendant Shahrokh Saadat-Nejad. NUNC PRO TUNC 3/26/2007 (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Part 2)(jah) (Entered: March 28, 2007) |
| March 29, 2007 | 11 | AFFIDAVIT of Service for Summons and Complaint Pacific Law Center and Solomon Ward Seidenwurm & Smith served on Shahrokh Saadat-Nejad on March 14, 2007, filed by Pacific Law Center. (McIntyre, Edward) (Entered: March 29, 2007) |
| March 29, 2007 | 12 | Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Larry Alan Burns : Motion Hearing held on 3/29/2007. Plaintiff's Ex Parte MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order 3 is granted in part and denied in part. Court to issue written order. Matter is referred to Magistrate Judge Porter for a settlement conference. Motion hearing on preliminary injunction, if applicable, shall be set for 4/26/07 at 12:00 pm; plaintiff's motion to be efiled by 4/16/07 before 5:00 pm; defendant's written opposition to be filed with the Clerk's Ofice by 4/23/07 before 5:00 pm (Court Reporter Eva Oemick / CRD: A. Ramos / Plaintiff Attorneys: Edward McIntryre & Christina Milligan / Pro Se Defendant: Shahrohk Saadat-Nejad) (acr) (Entered: March 29, 2007) |
| March 29, 2007 | 13 | ORDER, granting 3 Ex Parte MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order by Solomon Ward and filed by Pacific Law Center,. Settlement Conference set for 4/11/2007 10:00 AM in Courtroom H before Magistrate Judge Louisa S Porter. Preliminary Injunction Hearing set for 4/26/2007 12:00 PM in Courtroom 9 before Judge Larry Alan Burns. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 03/29/07. (joeh, ) (Entered: March 29, 2007) |
| March 29, 2007 | 14 | TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 03/29/07. (joeh, ) (Entered: March 29, 2007) |
| April 2, 2007 | 15 | ORDER; the court granted the application for temporary restraining order and separately enters the TRO; Magistrate Judge Porter set a settlement conference for Wednesday, April 11, 2007 at 10:00am in Courtroom H; no later than noon on April 9, 2007, the parties shall lodge in Magistrate Judge Porter's chambers their Confidential Settlement Briefs; Preliminary Injunction Hearing set for Thursday, April 26, 2007 at noon before Judge Larry A. Burns; plas supporting brief due on or before April 16, 2007; dft's reply/opposition due no later than April 23, 2007 at 5:00pm . Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 3/29/07. (kaj) (Entered: April 3, 2007) |
| April 3, 2007 | 16 | AFFIDAVIT of Service for Order Following Hearing on Plaintiffs' Application for a TRO Pacific Law Center and Solomon Ward served on Shahrokh Saadat-Nejad on April 3, 2007, filed by Pacific Law Center. (McIntyre, Edward) (Entered: April 3, 2007) |
| April 11, 2007 | 17 | ORDER; settlement conf held on 4/11/07; Settlement Conference set for 4/16/2007 01:30 PM in Courtroom H before Magistrate Judge Louisa S Porter. Signed by Magistrate Judge Louisa S Porter on 4/11/07. (kaj) (Entered: April 12, 2007) |
| April 11, 2007 | 19 | Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Louisa S Porter : Settlement Conference held on 4/11/2007. Order to follow. (Plaintiff Attorney Edward McIntyre).(Defendant Attorney Shahrokh Saadat-Nejad). (rfm, ) (Entered: April 17, 2007) |
| April 16, 2007 | 18 | Supplemental MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Pacific Law Center. (McIntyre, Edward) (Entered: April 16, 2007) |
| April 16, 2007 | 20 | Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Louisa S Porter : Settlement Conference held on 4/16/2007. Order to follow. (Plaintiff Attorney Edward McIntyre).(Defendant Attorney Shahrokh Saadat-Nejad). (rfm, ) (Entered: April 17, 2007) |
| April 17, 2007 | 21 | ORDER; telephonic settlement conf held on 4/16/07; Preliminary Injunction Hearing set for 4/26/2007 12:00 PM in Courtroom 9 before Judge Larry Alan Burns; Signed by Magistrate Judge Louisa S Porter on 4/17/07. (kaj) (Entered: April 18, 2007) |
| April 18, 2007 | 22 | RESPONSE in Support re 18 Supplemental MOTION for Preliminary Injunction Errata to Supplemental Memorandum filed by Pacific Law Center. (McIntyre, Edward) (Entered: April 18, 2007) |
| April 25, 2007 | 23 | Discrepancy Order by Judge Larry Alan Burns accepting document: response to pla's falsified and manufactured documents from Defendant Shahrokh Saadat-Nejad, non-compliance with local rule 7.1 or 47.1; other: missing proof of service; filing authorized by docket #15, dft to forthwith serve and file proof of service; Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 4/23/07. (kaj) (Entered: April 25, 2007) |
| April 25, 2007 | 24 | RESPONSE re 18 Supplemental MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Shahrokh Saadat-Nejad (nunc pro tunc 4/23/07) (kaj) (Entered: April 25, 2007) |
| April 27, 2007 | 25 | Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Larry Alan Burns: Motion Hearing held on 4/27/2007. 18 Supplemental MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Pacific Law Center held. Court to issued order.(Court Reporter Frank Rangus).(Plaintiff Attorney Edward McIntyre).(Defendant Attorney Shahrokh Saadt-Nejad). (tlw) (Entered: April 27, 2007) |
| April 27, 2007 | 26 | PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION; plaintiffs' counsel shall ensure service of this Order on Saadat-Nejad, and all other court documents, in the manner the parties have agreed on the record; Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 4/27/07. (kaj) (Entered: April 30, 2007) |
| April 30, 2007 | 27 | Declaration of Service on Shahrokh Saadat-Nejad re 26 by Pacific Law Center. (McIntyre, Edward) Modified on 5/1/2007 to correct text (kaj). (Entered: April 30, 2007) |
| May 8, 2007 | 28 | Request for Entry of Clerks Default against Shahrokh Saadat-Nejad. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Edward J. McIntyre# 2 [Proposed] Default by Clerk)(McIntyre, Edward) (Entered: May 8, 2007) |
| May 9, 2007 | 29 | SET ASIDE PER ORDER 32 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Shahrokh Saadat-Nejad (kaj) Modified on 5/29/2007 to reflect default is set aside (jpp, ). (Entered: May 9, 2007) |
| May 14, 2007 | 30 | Document stricken from the record per discrepancy order by Judge Burns on 5/15/07 31 (kaj) Modified on 5/16/2007 to strike document (kaj). (Entered: May 15, 2007) |
| May 15, 2007 | 31 | Discrepancy Order by Judge Larry Alan Burns rejecting document: Response & Oppose Default & Motion from Defendant Shahrokh Saadat-Nejad, non-compliance with local rule 5.1; other: no indication of ex parte request for relief from default or showing why dft is purportedly not in default; the exhibits are irrelevant to the default issue; argument regarding detail or merits of other cases is irrelevant to the default issue in this case; extraneous argument fails to show good cause for relief from the default; no motion to dismiss hearing was requested and none will be granted while defendant remains in default; the document is rejected, the clerk is ordered to strike the document from the record; Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 5/15/07. (kaj) (Entered: May 16, 2007) |
| May 25, 2007 | 32 | ORDER construing filing and granting Defendant's request for relief from Default. Shahrokh Saadat-Nejad answer due 6/11/2007.. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 05/25/07. (jpp, ) (Entered: May 29, 2007) |
| May 29, 2007 | 33 | Discrepancy Order by Judge Larry Alan Burns accepting document: Construed as: request for relief from default from Defendant Shahrokh Saadat-Nejad, non-compliance with local rule other: Clerk's Default Entered. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 05/24/07. (jpp, ) (Entered: May 29, 2007) |
| May 29, 2007 | 34 | REQUEST (filed as an answer) by Shahrokh Saadat-Nejad for relief from default. NUNC PRO TUNC 05/21/07.(jpp, ) (Entered: May 29, 2007) |
| June 11, 2007 | 35 | NOTICE (filed as an answer) t/w Declaration of Service by Shahrokh Saadat-Nejad (jpp, ) (Entered: June 11, 2007) |
| June 19, 2007 | 36 | Ex Parte MOTION for Contempt for Order to Show Cause Concerning Saadat-Nejad's Contempt by Pacific Law Center. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Edward J. McIntyre in Support of OSC re Contempt)(McIntyre, Edward) (Entered: June 19, 2007) |
| June 19, 2007 | 37 | Order Granting 36 Ex Parte Application and ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE why defendant Shahrok Saadat-Nejad should not be held in contempt of this Court's 04/26/07 Preliminary Injunction Order. Order to Show Cause Hearing set for 7/12/2007 12:00 PM in Courtroom 9 before Judge Larry Alan Burns. Plaintiff shall file their papers in support by 06/20/07.Saadat-Nejad may file responsive papers by 7/6/2007. Plaintiffs may file a reply by 7/9/2007. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 06/19/07. (jcj) (Entered: June 19, 2007) |
| June 19, 2007 | 38 | AFFIDAVIT re 37 Order to Show Cause, Terminate Motions, Set Hearings,,, Affidavit of Service of Order and Ex Parte Papers by Plaintiff Pacific Law Center. (McIntyre, Edward) (Entered: June 19, 2007) |
| June 20, 2007 | 39 | MOTION for Contempt re This Court's April 26, 2007 Preliminary Injunction by Pacific Law Center. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Edward J. McIntyre in Support of Order to Show Cause re Contempt# 2 Exhibit Notice of Lodmgent of Exhibits)(McIntyre, Edward) (Entered: June 20, 2007) |
| July 6, 2007 | 41 | REPLY re 37 Order to Show Cause, filed by Shahrokh Saadat-Nejad. (vrp)(mam). (Entered: July 9, 2007) |
| July 9, 2007 | 40 | REPLY re 39 MOTION for Contempt re This Court's April 26, 2007 Preliminary Injunction filed by Pacific Law Center. (McIntyre, Edward)(mam). (Entered: July 9, 2007) |
| July 12, 2007 | 42 | Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Larry Alan Burns : Show Cause Hearing held on 7/12/2007. Motion for contempt re: court's 4/26/07 preliminary injunction - granted. Court finds the dft in civil contempt of the preliminary injunction. Court orders the dft remanded into custody. Court orders dft detained without bail. Abstract to USM.Further Status Conference set for 7/25/2007 12:15 PM in Courtroom 9 before Judge Larry Alan Burns.(Court Reporter EVA OEMICK).(Plaintiff Attorney Edward McIntyre and Thomas Slattery).(Defendant Attorney Shahrokh Saadat-Nejad). (tlw) (Entered: July 13, 2007) |
| July 12, 2007 | 44 | ABSTRACT OF ORDER remanding defendant for civil contempt. No Bail. Abstract issued to USM.(vrp)(bar ). (Entered: July 17, 2007) |
| July 16, 2007 | 43 | ORDER following hearing on Order to Show Cause re Contempt, granting 39 Motion for Contempt. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 7/13/07. Saadat-Nejad shall remain in custody until the next scheduled hearing in this matter, set for 7/25/07 at 12:15PM before Judge Larry A. Burns. (vrp)(bar ). (Entered: July 16, 2007) |
| July 17, 2007 | 45 | TRANSCRIPT of Motion/Miscellaneous Hearing held on 04/26/2007 before Judge Larry Alan Burns. Court Reporter: Frank J. Rangus. (mkz) (Entered: July 18, 2007) |
| July 23, 2007 | 46 | Amicus Curiae APPEARANCE entered by John David Blair-Loy on behalf of San Diego ACLU. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit BRIEF OF AMICUS CURIAE ACLU OF SAN DIEGO & IMPERIAL COUNTIES)(Blair-Loy, John) (Entered: July 23, 2007) |
| July 24, 2007 | 47 | Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Larry Alan Burns: The American Civil Liberties Union of San Diego & Imperial Counties has applied to the Court for leave to file a brief in amicus curiae associated with civil contempt proceedings in this matter. The 46 Application is Granted, and the brief is accepted for filing and consideration at the 07/25/07 hearing. (jcj) (Entered: July 24, 2007) |
| July 24, 2007 | 48 | DECLARATION of Edward J. McIntyre by Plaintiff Pacific Law Center. (McIntyre, Edward) (Entered: July 24, 2007) |
| July 25, 2007 | 49 | Abstract of Order. Defendant be released from custody. (jcj) (Entered: July 27, 2007) |
| July 25, 2007 | 50 | Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Larry Alan Burns : Status Conference held on 7/25/2007. Court orders the dft released from custody. Abstract to USM. Court to issue order.(Court Reporter EVA OEMICK).(Plaintiff Attorney Edward McIntyre) (Attorney: John David Blair-Loy).(Defendant Shahrokh Saadat-Nejad). (tlw) (Entered: July 30, 2007) |
| July 27, 2007 | 51 | ORDER following status hearing of 7/25/07, purging civil contempt, and setting case management conference. Case Management Conference set for 8/29/2007 01:30 PM in Courtroom H before Magistrate Judge Louisa S Porter. Signed by Judge Larry Alan Burns on 7/25/07. (vrp)(bar ). (Entered: July 30, 2007) |
| August 29, 2007 | 52 | Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Louisa S Porter : Case Management Conference held on 8/29/2007. Rule 16 dates issued. Order to follow. (Plaintiff Attorney Edward McIntyre).(Defendant Attorney Shahrokh Saadat-Nejad). (rfm) (Entered: September 4, 2007) |
| September 4, 2007 | 53 | Case Management ORDER regulating Discovery and other Pretrial proceedings: On 8/29/07, the Court held a Case Management Conference. All Discovery shall be completed on or before 1/4/08. All motions shall be filed on or before 2/4/08. Pretrial Disclosures shall be prepared, served and lodged with the Clerk of the Court on or before 6/2/08. The Final Pretrial Conference is set for 6/9/2008 10:45 AM in Courtroom 9 before Judge Larry Alan Burns. The Proposed final pretrial conference order is to be served and lodged with the Clerk's Office on or before 6/2/08. Signed by Judge Louisa S Porter on 9/4/07. (vrp) Modified on 9/5/2007 to correct hearing date (vrp)(bar ). (Entered: September 4, 2007) |
| October 2, 2007 | 54 | MINUTE ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Janis Sammartino for all further proceedings. Case No. 07CV0460-JLS(POR). Judge Larry Alan Burns no longer assigned to caseFinal Pretrial Conference set for 6/9/2008 10:45 AM in Courtroom 6 before Janis Sammartino. (nsp) (Entered: October 2, 2007) |
| November 15, 2007 | 55 | MOTION for Permanent Injunction by Pacific Law Center. (Attachments: # 1 Memo of Points and Authorities in Support of Permanent Injunction# 2 Declaration of Edward J. McIntyre in Support of Permanent Injunction)(McIntyre, Edward) (Entered: 11/15/2007) |
| March 6, 2008 | 56 | ORDER Scheduling Settlement Conference: A Settlement Conference will be held on 3/17/2008 at 03:30 PM in Courtroom H before Magistrate Judge Louisa S Porter. Signed by Judge Louisa S Porter on 03/06/08. (mkz) (av1, ). (Entered: March 6, 2008) |
| March 13, 2008 | 57 | Discrepancy Order by Judge Janis L. Sammartino accepting document: Response and Opposition from Defendant Shahrokh Saadat-Nejad, non-compliance with local rule 7.1: Missing Table of Contents and Other: No Proof of Service. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 03/13/08. (mkz) (av1, ). (Entered: March 14, 2008) |
| March 13, 2008 | 58 | RESPONSE in Opposition re 55 MOTION for Permanent Injunction filed by Shahrokh Saadat-Nejad. NUNC PRO TUNC 3/13/08 (mkz) (Entered: March 14, 2008) |
| March 17, 2008 | 59 | MOTION to Substitute Attorney by Pacific Law Center. (Spears, Alan) Modified on 3/19/2008, atty contacted re proposed order (mkz). (mkz). (Entered: March 17, 2008) |
| March 17, 2008 | 62 | Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Louisa S Porter : Settlement Conference held on 3/17/2008.(Plaintiff Attorney Edward McIntyre).(Defendant Attorney Shahrokh Saadat-Nejad). (rfm) (Entered: April 2, 2008) |
| March 21, 2008 | 60 | REPLY to Response to Motion re 55 MOTION for Permanent Injunction filed by Solomon Ward Seidenwurm and Smith LLP. (McIntyre, Edward) (mkz). (mkz). (Entered: March 21, 2008) |
| March 24, 2008 | 61 | ORDER Denying Plaintiffs' 55 Motion for Permanent Injunction Without Prejudice; Requesting Plaintiffs to Show Cause as to Why this Court Should not Abstain and Stay these Proceedings due to Parallel State Court Proceedings; and Granting Plaintiffs' 59 Motion to Substitution of Attorney: Plaintiff shall file a response to this Order by 4/25/08. Added attorney Robert F Clarke for Pacific Law Center, Attorney Edward J McIntyre terminated as counsel for Pacific Law Center. The Court vacates the 3/28/08 hearing on Plaintiffs' motion for a permanent injunction. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 03/24/08. (mkz) (av1, ). (Entered: March 24, 2008) |
| April 8, 2008 | 63 | Discrepancy Order by Judge Janis L. Sammartino accepting document: Writ of Mandamus from Defendant Shahrokh Saadat-Nejad, non-compliance with local rule Other: Supplemental Documents require Court Order. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 04/08/08. (mkz) (Entered: April 9, 2008) |
| April 8, 2008 | 64 | MOTION for Writ of Mandamus by Shahrokh Saadat-Nejad. (Attachments: # 1 Part 2 of Motion) NUNC PRO TUNC 3/27/08(mkz) (Entered: 04/09/2008) |
| April 9, 2008 | 65 | ORDER Denying Defendant's 64 Motion for "Writ of Mandamus": Defendant requests that the Court: (1) order Plaintiffs to provide him a copy of his 8/3/06 retainer with Pacific Law Center, and (2) send the federal "court file" to Judge Richard Strauss who is presider over the parallel state court case against Defendant. The Court denies Defendant's first request as premature because he has failed to show that Plaintiffs have failed to comply with any particular discovery request under Rule 34 of the FRCP. The Court also denies Defendant's second request because there is no legal basis for it. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 04/09/08. (mkz) (Entered: April 9, 2008) |
| April 24, 2008 | 66 | REPLY re 61 Order on Motion for Permanent Injunction, Order on Motion to Substitute Attorney,Order Why This Court Should Not Abstain and Stay These Proceedings filed by Solomon Ward Seidenwurm and Smith LLP. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Notice of Lodgment of Exhibits)(McIntyre, Edward) (mkz). (Entered: April 24, 2008) |
| April 25, 2008 | 67 | RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Pacific Law Center. (Clarke, Robert) (mkz). (Entered: April 25, 2008) |
| April 25, 2008 | 68 | NOTICE by Pacific Law Center re 67 Response to Order to Show Cause (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Request for Dismissal, # 2 Exhibit Attachment 1, # 3 Exhibit Attachment 2, # 4 Exhibit Attachment 3, # 5 Exhibit Attachment 4, # 6 Exhibit Attachment 4, # 7 Exhibit Attachment 6, # 8 Exhibit Attachment 7, # 9 Exhibit Attachment 8, # 10 Memo of Points and Authorities Attachment 9, # 11 Exhibit Attachment 10, # 12 Exhibit Attachment 11, # 13 Exhibit Attachment 12, # 14 Exhibit Attachment 13, # 15 Exhibit Attachment 14, # 16 Exhibit Attachment 15, # 17 Exhibit Attachment 16, # 18 Exhibit Attachment 18, # 19 Exhibit Attachment 18, # 20 Exhibit Attachment 19, # 21 Exhibit Attachment 20, # 22 Exhibit Attachment 21, # 23 Exhibit Attachment 22, # 24 Exhibit Attachment 23, # 25 Exhibit Attachment 24, # 26 Exhibit Attachment 25, # 27 Exhibit Attachment 26, # 28 Exhibit Attachment 27, # 29 Exhibit Attachment 28, # 30 Exhibit Attachment 29, # 31 Exhibit Attachment 30, # 32 Exhibit Attachment 31, # 33 Exhibit Attachment 32, # 34 Exhibit Attachment 33, # 35 Exhibit Attachment 34, # 36 Exhibit Attachment 35, # 37 Exhibit Attachment 36, # 38 Exhibit Attachment 37, # 39 Exhibit Attachment 38, # 40 Exhibit Attachment 39, # 41 Exhibit Attachment 40, # 42 Exhibit Attachment 41, # 43 Exhibit Attachment 42, # 44 Exhibit Attachment 43, # 45 Exhibit Attachment 44, # 46 Exhibit Attachment 45, # 47 Exhibit Attachment 46, # 48 Exhibit Attachment 48, # 49 Exhibit Attachment 49, # 50 Exhibit Attachment 50, # 51 Exhibit Attachment 51, # 52 Declaration Declaration of Tatiana Ganuza)(Clarke, Robert) (mkz). (Entered: April 25, 2008) |
| April 25, 2008 | 69 | DECLARATION re 68 Notice, 67 Response to Order to Show Cause Proof of Service by Plaintiff Pacific Law Center. (Clarke, Robert) (mkz). (Entered: April 25, 2008) |
| May 5, 2008 | 70 | Discrepancy Order by Judge Janis L. Sammartino accepting document: Reply from Defendant Shahrokh Saadat-Nejad, non-compliance with local rule Other: No Provision for reply. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 05/05/08. (mkz) (Entered: May 6, 2008) |
| May 5, 2008 | 71 | REPLY re 67 Response to Order to Show Cause filed by Shahrokh Saadat-Nejad. (mkz) Modified on 5/6/2008 to indicate: NUNC PRO TUNC 4/30/08 (mkz). (Entered: May 6, 2008) |
| May 14, 2008 | 72 | Minute Entry : On Court's own motion, Final Pretrial Conference reset from 6/9/08 to 6/12/2008 01:30 PM before Judge Janis L. Sammartino (df/acr) (Entered: May 14, 2008) |
| May 19, 2008 | 73 | NOTICE Solomon Ward's Pre-Trial Disclosures [Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3)] (McIntyre, Edward) (mkz). (Entered: May 19, 2008) |
| May 19, 2008 | 74 | NOTICE Pacific Law Center's Pre- Trial Disclosures pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3) (Clarke, Robert) (mkz). (Entered: May 19, 2008) |
| May 21, 2008 | 75 | NOTICE of Pre-Trial Disclosures by Shahrokh Saadat-Nejad (mkz) (Entered: May 21, 2008) |
| May 28, 2008 | 76 | MEMORANDUM OF FACTS AND CONTENTIONS OF LAW by Solomon Ward Seidenwurm and Smith LLP. (Attachments: # 1 Solomon Ward's Exhibit List, # 2 Solomon Ward's Witness List)(McIntyre, Edward) Modified on 5/29/2008, atty contacted re s/ (mkz). (Entered: 05/28/2008) |
| May 28, 2008 | 77 | MEMORANDUM OF FACTS AND CONTENTIONS OF LAW by Pacific Law Center. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit list, # 2 Exhibit Witness list)(Clarke, Robert) (mkz). (Entered: May 28, 2008) |
| June 12, 2008 | 79 | Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Janis L. Sammartino : Pretrial Conference held on 6/12/2008 (Court Reporter Gayle Wakefield / CRD A Ramos / Plaintiff Attorney Robert F. Clark & Edward McIntyre / Defendant Pro Se Shahrokh Saadat-Nejad)(acr) (Entered: June 16, 2008) |
| June 16, 2008 | 78 | ORDER Directing Parties to Show Cause as to Why Summary Judgment Should not Entered: The Court held a pre-trial conference on 6/12/08. If the parties cannot resolve this dispute prior to 7/25/08, the parties shall submit their briefs in accordance with this Order. Plaintiffs shall file their brief by 7/25/2008. Defendant shall file his response by 8/15/08. Plaintiffs may file a reply by 8/27/08. Judge Burns' preliminary injunction order remains in effect until the Court rules otherwise. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 06/16/08. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(mkz) (Entered: June 16, 2008) |
| July 25, 2008 | 80 | BRIEF Addressing Issues This Court's Order Raised Directing Parties to Show Cause Why Summary Judgment Should Not Be Entered by Solomon Ward Seidenwurm and Smith LLP. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Edward J. McIntyre, # 2 Declaration of Michael M. Vasseghi, # 3 Exhibit Notice of Lodgment of Exhibits)(McIntyre, Edward) Modified on 7/28/2008 to term motion, correct event (mkz). (Entered: July 25, 2008) |
| August 1, 2008 | 81 | Notice of Document Discrepancy and Order Thereon by Judge Janis L. Sammartino Accepting Document: Declaration from Defendant Shahrokh Saadat-Nejad. Non-compliance with local rule(s), OTHER: Supplemental documents require court order. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The document is accepted despite the discrepancy noted above. Any further non-compliant documents may be stricken from the record (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(mkz) (Entered: August 1, 2008) |
| August 1, 2008 | 82 | DECLARATION by Defendant Shahrokh Saadat-Nejad. NUNC PRO TUNC 7/25/08 (mkz) (Entered: August 1, 2008) |
| August 11, 2008 | 83 | Discrepancy Order by Judge Janis L. Sammartino accepting document: Motion for Extension of Time from Defendant Shahrokh Saadat-Nejad, non-compliance with local rule 5.1: Missing time and date on motion and/or supporting documentation. Signed by chambers of Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 08/07/08. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(mkz) (Entered: 08/11/2008) |
| August 11, 2008 | 84 | MOTION for Extension of 6/16/08 Court Order Directing Parties to Show Cause by Shahrokh Saadat-Nejad. NUNC PRO TUNC 8/7/08 (mkz) (Entered: August 11, 2008) |
| August 14, 2008 | 85 | Response in Opposition re 82 Declaration, filed by Solomon Ward Seidenwurm and Smith LLP. (McIntyre, Edward) Modified on 8/19/2008 to link to proper doc (mkz). (Entered: August 14, 2008) |
| August 15, 2008 | 86 | Response to 80 Brief re Order to Show Cause filed by Shahrokh Saadat-Nejad. (mkz) (Entered: August 18, 2008) |
| August 18, 2008 | 87 | REPLY to Response to Motion re 78 Order to Show Cause, filed by Solomon Ward Seidenwurm and Smith LLP. (McIntyre, Edward) (mkz). (Entered: August 18, 2008) |
| September 2, 2008 | 88 | ORDER Granting Summary Judgment in Favor of Defendant and Dismissing all of Plaintiffs' Claims. Signed by Judge Janis L. Sammartino on 09/02/08. (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(mkz) (Entered: September 2, 2008) |
| September 2, 2008 | 89 | CLERK'S JUDGMENT: IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED *The Court grants summary judgment in favor of the Defendant and dismisses all of Plaintiffs' claims* (All non-registered users served via U.S. Mail Service).(mkz) (Entered: September 2, 2008) |
http://www.San-Diego-Police.com
Free Consultation with a San Diego Bankruptcy Attorney at Pacific Law Center Schedule a free consultation with a San Diego bankruptcy attorney. Pacific Law Center can help you determine whether you should file for Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 pacificlawcenter.com/html/bankruptcy_consultation.html
San Diego nursing home lawyers and elder abuse Pacific Law Center
If your loved one has been subjected to nursing home abuse, contact the lawyers Home. Our Lawyers. Criminal Law " Criminal Court Cases " Defendant Rights pacificlawcenter.com/html/nursing_home_abuse.html
Recall Notice for Zimmer Durom Cup Hip: Lawyer, Zimmer Attorney Dr. Dorr spoke against the Durom Cup - Zimmer denied any problems, in July of 2008 the company announced a recall Home. Our Lawyers. Criminal Law
pacificlawcenter.com/html/zimmer.html
About Gardasil Injections: Side Effects, Dangers and possible Death. Gardasil side effects can affect girls between the ages of 9 to 25, if you've been hurt or injured from Gardasil our lawyers and attorneys offer a free consultation. pacificlawcenter.com/html/gardasil.html
Cipro Problems FDA Warning & Side Effects of Cipro and Cipro has been linked to the development of tendon ruptures and tendonitis To view this, you need to install the Flash Player 7. Please go to here and pacificlawcenter.com/html/cipro.html
Heparin Anti Coagulant Injection Linked to Side Effects Recalled The products being recalled are Heparin and Normal Saline pre-filled flushes. To view this, you need to install the Flash Player 7. Please go to here and pacificlawcenter.com/html/heparin.html
Recalled Medications Actavis Totowa Drug Alert, Attorney Drug Lawyer Below is a list of recalled Actavis Totowa drug medications. To view this, you need to install the Flash Player 7. Please go to here and download it. pacificlawcenter.com/html/actavis.html
Digitek & Heart Medication Recalled. Possible Digitek Lawsuit Heart Medication drug under several names like Digitek by Actavis Totowa has risks To view this, you need to install the Flash Player 7. Please go to here pacificlawcenter.com/html/digitek.html
Byetta Deaths FDA Warning Diabetes Drug Lawyer & Attorney San Diego
Byetta deaths lawyer in San Diego information regarding the FDA Warning about Byetta To view this, you need to install the Flash Player 7. Please go to pacificlawcenter.com/html/byetta.html
Your rights and FLSA laws: Wage and Hour Attorney, FLSA Lawsuit info.
Under the FLSA laws, wage and hour attorney can help with the FLSA issues Home. Our Lawyers. Criminal Law Criminal Court Cases Defendant Rights pacificlawcenter.com/html/flsa_wageandhourclaims.html
= USTED DEBE EVITAR =
Pacific Law Center
Jeffrey L. Phillips quien es el propietario de Pacific Law Center (PacificLawCenter.com) en California y es el propietario de Phillips & Associates Oficina Jurídica (PhillipsLaw.com) en Arizona ha sido durante años alegando que un abogado de California Apertura Hasta un bufete de abogados de San Diego y luego a sí mismo para tergiversar la opinión pública como un abogado de California - pero él no es un abogado de California.
A continuación se presentan los resultados de la búsqueda de google.com
| Jeffrey L. Phillips. Firm:, Pacific Law Center. Address:, 4225 Executive Square Suite 1550 ... State Bar of Arizona Member. State Bar of California Member ... pview.findlaw.com/view/1722400_2?noconfirm=0 - 25k - |
| John A. Schill. Firm:, Pacific Law Center. Address:, 4225 Executive Square Suite 1550 La Jolla, CA 92037 Map & Directions. Phone:, (877) 749-0000 ... pview.findlaw.com/view/2834483_2 - 19k - |
| Barry S. Wagner. Firm:, Pacific Law Center. Address:, 4225 Executive Square Suite 1550 La Jolla, CA 92037 Map & Directions. Phone:, (877) 749-0000 ... pview.findlaw.com/view/3549451_2?noconfirm=0 - 22k - |
El centro "es un ilegal" frente "organización creada por Larry acusados principales, Austin grandes, y Jeffrey Phillips les permita participar y beneficiarse de la práctica no autorizada de la ley," uno de sus ex abogados dice en el Tribunal Superior.
Ni Larry grandes multinacionales, grandes o Austin Jeffrey Phillips es un abogado, dice Hancock. Austin es Larry grandes grandes hijo, y es Larry Phillips grandes hijo en la ley, dice.
Hancock Spears se describe como "uno de los' delante los abogados de permitir que los demás no-abogado de los acusados de controlar la empresa. Spears tiene conocimiento efectivo de la empresa la verdadera propiedad y el control, sin embargo, en violación de las normas jurídicas y éticas funciones impuesta por la su membresía en el Colegio de Abogados, sigue a no permitir que el abogado-cliente para hacer decisiones y los beneficios de la práctica no autorizada de la ley ".
Afirma demandado Christopher Castillo no es un abogado autorizado para ejercer su profesión en California, y que "Castillo en el papel de la conspiración es gestionar y supervisar la" ingesta de coordinadores, "la empresa jurídica vendedores, que tienen instrucciones de como extraer una alta cantidad de abogado los honorarios que el cliente se compromete a soportar. Castillo de las acciones están controladas, directa e indirectamente, por Larry acusados principales, Austin grandes, y Jeffery Phillips. El abogado de 'front-hombres', Spears y Slattery, operan bajo instrucción específica de la Demandada a Phillips ejercer ningún control o autoridad sobre el Castillo o los vendedores".
Y él dice Stiegerwalt es un abogado que "sabía o debería razonablemente haber tenido conocimiento de la ilegalidad y ética las actividades realizadas por cada uno de Demandada (sic). Steigerwalt su papel en la conspiración de la entrada consistió en un simulacro de transacción de venta con el fin de proteger los bienes el uno del otro acusado en el caso de la responsabilidad en virtud de la presente denuncia ".
Hancock, que presentó la denuncia PRO SE, exige un requerimiento judicial y daños punitivos por conspiración para participar en la práctica no autorizada de la ley, la aprobación de la gestión constructiva, el fraude en la inducción, el enriquecimiento sin causa, y solicita al tribunal la anulación fraudulenta de transporte.
___________________
Nunca he oído hablar de Larry Austin grandes o grandes, hasta que leí el artículo anterior.
¿Por qué Mr.Carl Hancock quedarse con el bufete de abogados durante tanto tiempo? ¿Por qué no acaba de salir de los minutos descubrió el curso de fraude y les informe?
Según el artículo, Carl Hancock fue disparado desde el Pacífico Law Center. - Carl Hancock presentó su denuncia civil después de que fue despedido - podría ser la venganza, y / o chantaje?
Cada denuncia civil que participen del Pacífico Centro de Derecho en el Estado de California, y Phillips & Associates Bufete de abogados en el Estado de Arizona, incluyendo cada artículo de noticias negativas en contra de ellos que nunca salió hasta que empezó a exponer el fraude en curso, no menciona que , como mínimo, Jeffrey L. Phillips, y John A. Schill han sido la publicidad a sí mismos como abogados con licencia de California desde hace varios años, en el que fueron nunca los abogados con licencia de California y que aún no se porque no mantener el Examen de California .
Uno de los muchos métodos que Pacífico Law Center, y Phillips & Associates Bufete uso de sobornar a otros abogados, fiscales, y la Ley o por las empresas es aumentar su volumen de clientes. Pacífico Law Center, y Phillips & Associates Bufete de abogados de la financiación a través de un tercero y un único o múltiples "Servicio de Referencia de Abogados" - desconocidas para el público en general que en contacto con el Servicio de Referencia de Abogados, que la mayoría, si no todo el tiempo se refieren a Pacífico Law Center, Phillips & Associates bufete de abogados, o un abogado o bufete de abogados que está siendo sobornado por el Pacífico Law Center, y Phillips & Associates Bufete de abogados.
Si una persona contrata a un abogado y / o un bufete de abogados para presentar una demanda contra la Ley del Pacífico Centro, y / o Phillips & Associates Bufete lo más probable es que se sobornó a través de este método de ilegal el soborno.
= USTED DEBE EVITAR =
Pacific Law Center
| SN037043 | PACIFIC LAW CENTER | ZITO, PHYLLIS | North County | Civil | 05/01/2006 |
| SC158346 | PACIFIC LAW CENTER | GOMEZ, ISABEL | Kearny Mesa | Civil | 12/07/2004 |
| GIC879397 | PACIFIC LAW CENTER | LUCKMAN, CHARLES | San Diego | Civil | 02/01/2007 |
| GIC878352 | PACIFIC LAW CENTER | SAADAT-NEJAD, SHAHROKH | San Diego | Civil | 01/12/2007 |
| GIC871101 | PACIFIC LAW CENTER | MELTZ, TODD CLAYTON | San Diego | Civil | 08/18/2006 |
| 37-2008-00079426-CU-PN-CTL | PACIFIC LAW CENTER | TAYLOR, JERRY M | San Diego | Civil | 03/07/2008 |
| 37-2007-00081241-CU-BC-CTL | PACIFIC LAW CENTER | MOBILE BILLBOARDS OF SAN DIEGO | San Diego | Civil | 11/05/2007 |
| 37-2007-00078059-CU-PN-CTL | PACIFIC LAW CENTER | ELDRIDGE, NATALIE | San Diego | Civil | 10/17/2007 |
| 37-2007-00071478-CU-PN-CTL | PACIFIC LAW CENTER | HALL, MARSHA | San Diego | Civil | 07/24/2007 |
| 37-2007-00014240-SC-SC-CTL | PACIFIC LAW CENTER | REDLANDS INSURANCE COMPANY | Kearny Mesa | Civil | 07/31/2007 |
| 37-2007-00013122-SC-SC-CTL | PACIFIC LAW CENTER | ROSENSON, D M D , P C, JACK A | Kearny Mesa | Civil | 06/15/2007 |
| 37-2008-00084507-CU-FR-CTL | PACIFIC LAW CENTER CRIMINAL DEFENSE P C | CRAVENS, KAREN | San Diego | Civil | 05/23/2008 |
| 37-2008-00089067-CU-UD-CTL | PACIFIC LAW CENTER INC | 3D/INTERNATIONAL INC | San Diego | Civil | 08/05/2008 |
| GIC882306 | PACIFIC LAW CENTER P C | MARKSON, ESQ, RYAN G | San Diego | Civil | 03/23/2007 |
| GIC869606 | PACIFIC LAW CENTER P C | COSSIO, C COLIN, ESQ | San Diego | Civil | 07/24/2006 |
| GIC868515 | PACIFIC LAW CENTER P C | RHOAD, KRISTEN | San Diego | Civil | 07/03/2006 |
| 37-2008-00002264-SC-SC-CTL | PACIFIC LAW CENTER P C | ERB, TRUDIE | Kearny Mesa | Civil | 03/25/2008 |
| 37-2007-00081241-CU-BC-CTL | PACIFIC LAW CENTER P C | MOBILE BILLBOARDS OF SAN DIEGO | San Diego | Civil | 11/05/2007 |
| GIC872419 | PACIFIC LAW CENTER PC | COSSIO, COLIN C | San Diego | Civil | 09/13/2006 |
| 37-2008-00078560-CU-WT-CTL | PACIFIC LAW CENTER PC | HANCOCK, CARL M | San Diego | Civil | 02/22/2008 |
| SC150154 | PACIFIC LAW CENTER, P C | SANCHEZ, JOAQUIN TAPIA | Kearny Mesa | Civil | 03/10/2004 |
| GIS26363 | PACIFIC LAW CENTER, P C | GATEWAY CHULA VISTA 2, LLC | South County | Civil | 09/28/2006 |
| 37-2008-00090690-CU-PN-CTL | PACIFIC LAW CENTER, P C | FRIEDMAN, RICHARD | San Diego | Civil | 08/29/2008 |
| 37-2008-00084507-CU-FR-CTL | PACIFIC LAW CENTER, P C | CRAVENS, KAREN | San Diego | Civil | 05/23/2008 |
| GIC879397 | PACIFIC LAW CENTERS PC | LUCKMAN, CHARLES | San Diego | Civil | 02/01/2007 |
Specializing in criminal defense and DUI laws in the state of California. Offers free private consultations in San Diego. pacificlawcenter.com
DUI Lawyers in San Diego | DUI Defense Attorney in San Diego | Drunk
Learn about driving under the influence or DUI / DWI, commonly called 'drunk driving' Home. Our Lawyers. Criminal Law " Criminal Court Cases " Defendant Rights " pacificlawcenter.com/html/dui.html
San Diego, Southern California Peter Pan® Peanut Butter Salmonella and
In San Diego and Southern California our Peter Pan® peanut butter recall To view this, you need to install the Flash Player 7. Please go to here and download it. pacificlawcenter.com/html/peanut_butter.html
San Diego Personal Injury Lawyers | Personal Injury Attorney in San
Learn about personal injury law. An attorney at our San Diego practice can help if you or a loved one has been injured through the negligence of another party.
pacificlawcenter.com/html/personal_injury.html
Criminal defense attorneys - San Diego - Bankruptcy attorneys - Pacific
Read about the criminal defense, DUI, bankruptcy, and personal injury lawyers in Home. Our Lawyers. Criminal Law " Criminal Court Cases " Defendant Rights " pacificlawcenter.com/html/lawyers.html
San Diego Domestic Violence Lawyers | Spousal Abuse Attorney in San Diego
Learn about your rights under criminal law when arrested. Home. Our Lawyers. Criminal Law " Criminal Court Cases " Defendant Rights " pacificlawcenter.com/html/domestic_violence.html
San Diego, La Jolla - Medical malpractice lawyers - Attorneys with ...
For a medical malpractice attorney in San Diego County, consider Pacific Law Center. Hepatitis C Outbreak at Nevada Medical Facility. Read More pacificlawcenter.com/html/medical_mal.html
San Diego birth injury and cerebral palsy lawyers, Pacific Law Center
If your child suffered a birth injury, contact the lawyers at San Diego's Pacific Law Center. Home. Our Lawyers. Criminal Law " Criminal Court Cases " pacificlawcenter.com/html/birth_injury.html
Fosamax® Injury Attorneys in San Diego - Pacific Law Center
Learn more about the legal issues surrounding the prescription drug Fosamax®. The injury attorneys at the San Diego offices of Pacific Law Center can help you pacificlawcenter.com/html/fosamax.html
Paxil® Attorneys / Lawyers – San Diego, Southern California – Pacific
If your child suffers from a birth defect and you used prescription Paxil® To view this, you need to install the Flash Player 7. Please go to here and pacificlawcenter.com/html/paxil.html
San Diego car accident lawyers - Pacific Law Center
If you have been injured in an auto accident, the lawyers at San Diego's Pacific Home. Our Lawyers. Criminal Law " Criminal Court Cases " Defendant Rights " pacificlawcenter.com/html/auto_accidents.html
San Diego Truck Accident Lawyers | Trucking Accident Attorney in San
Large truck accidents can cause catastrophic injuries to drivers, passengers, Home. Our Lawyers. Criminal Law " Criminal Court Cases " Defendant Rights " pacificlawcenter.com/html/trucking_accidents.html
Auto Insurance Information - Accident Lawyers in San Diego, California
If you have been in an auto accident, the lawyers at our San Diego office can help. Home. Our Lawyers. Criminal Law " Criminal Court Cases " Defendant Rights " pacificlawcenter.com/html/auto_insurance.html
Defendant Rights - by a Criminal Defense Attorney in San Diego, California
Learn about the rights of a defendant in a criminal trial. Home. Our Lawyers. Criminal Law " Criminal Court Cases " Defendant Rights " pacificlawcenter.com/html/defendant_rights.html
Endoscopy Hep C Lawsuit, Law firm for Victim of the Hepatitis outbreak.
40,000 people may have been infected from the Nevada Endoscopy center Home. Our Lawyers. Criminal Law " Criminal Court Cases " Defendant Rights " pacificlawcenter.com/html/hepatitis-c.html
San Diego Vioxx Lawyers - Pacific Law Center - Attorneys at Law
Learn about the harmful side effects of Vioxx®. The lawyers at our San Diego To view this, you need to install the Flash Player 7. Please go to here and pacificlawcenter.com/html/vioxx.html
Tequin-related Injury and Illness: Attorneys Serving San Diego and
A Tequin-related illness or injury is a serious, possibly life-threatening matter. To view this, you need to install the Flash Player 7. Please go to here pacificlawcenter.com/html/tequin.html
San Diego Vioxx Lawyers - Pacific Law Center - Attorneys at Law
Learn about dangerous drugs and associated lawsuits in the San Diego region. To view this, you need to install the Flash Player 7. Please go to here and pacificlawcenter.com/html/dangerous_drugs.html
Phillips and Associates, San Diego, California - Breaking Legal News
Learn about the harmful side effects of ephedra. Your Rights If Arrested " Types of Criminal Cases " Criminal Defense Lawyer " pacificlawcenter.com/html/news.html
ORTHO EVRA® Birth Control Patch - Experienced Lawyers Serving San Diego
The ORTHO EVRA® birth control patch lawyers at the San Diego offices of the Pacific Law Center can help you if you've suffered blood clot-related problems due to pacificlawcenter.com/html/ortho-evra.html
San Diego bankruptcy lawyers - Pacific Law Center
If you are faced with bankruptcy, an attorney with our San Diego practice can help. Home. Our Lawyers. Criminal Law " Criminal Court Cases " Defendant Rights " pacificlawcenter.com/html/bankruptcy.html
Trust Your Seroquel® Lawsuit to a Skilled Pacific Law Center Attorney
Seroquel® has been linked to serious side effects including diabetes. To view this, you need to install the Flash Player 7. Please go to here and download it. pacificlawcenter.com/html/seroquel.html
Retaining a Criminal Defense Lawyer at San Diego's Pacific Law Center
Why hire a criminal defense lawyer from our San Diego law firm? Home. Our Lawyers. Criminal Law " Criminal Court Cases " Defendant Rights " pacificlawcenter.com/html/criminal_defense_lawyer.html
San Diego criminal attorneys - Pacific Law Center
Learn about your rights under criminal law when arrested. Home. Our Lawyers. Criminal Law " Criminal Court Cases " Defendant Rights " pacificlawcenter.com/html/criminal_law.html
San Diego wrongful death lawyers - Pacific Law Center - Attorneys at Law
If your loved one suffered wrongful death, the lawyers of San Diego's Pacific Home. Our Lawyers. Criminal Law " Criminal Court Cases " Defendant Rights " pacificlawcenter.com/html/wrongful_death.html
San Diego DUI Defense Attorneys Explain Your Legal Rights - Pacific Law
If you have been charged with driving under the influence, learn about your rights. ... Home. Our Lawyers. Criminal Law " Criminal Court Cases " Defendant Rights " pacificlawcenter.com/html/dui_your_rights.html
San Diego Product Liability Lawyers | Product Defect Attorney in San
If you have a product liability claim, the lawyers at our San Diego practice can ... Home. Our Lawyers. Criminal Law " Criminal Court Cases " Defendant Rights " pacificlawcenter.com/html/product_liability.html
How A San Diego DUI Lawyer Can Help - Pacific Law Center
Residents of San Diego arrested for DUI can trust a lawyer from Pacific Law Center. Home. Our Lawyers. Criminal Law " Criminal Court Cases " Defendant Rights " pacificlawcenter.com/html/dui_lawyer.html
San Diego, California - Defective Stryker Hip and Joint Replacement
If you or a loved one has been injured by a defective Stryker hip or joint replacement implant, our attorneys in Southern California can help you pursue pacificlawcenter.com/html/stryker.html
San Diego DUI lawyers - Frequently Asked Questions - Pacific Law Center
Residents of San Diego can hire a DUI attorney from Pacific Law Center. Home. Our Lawyers. Criminal Law " Criminal Court Cases " Defendant Rights " pacificlawcenter.com/html/dui_faq.html
San Diego Personal Injury, Bankruptcy, Criminal Defense, and DUI
Pacific Law Center handles cases involving bankruptcy, DUI, criminal defense, Home. Our Lawyers. Criminal Law " Criminal Court Cases " Defendant Rights " pacificlawcenter.com/html/fees.html
Duragesic® Patch Recall: Experienced Lawyers Serving San Diego and the
The Duragesic® Patch recall lawyers of the Pacific Law Center (serving San Diego and the United States) protect the legal rights of all consumers injured by pacificlawcenter.com/html/duragesic-patch.html
Avandia® Lawyer – Lawsuit Information on Avandia® Side Effects from an
The diabetes drug Avandia® has been found to have side effects that include a To view this, you need to install the Flash Player 7. Please go to here and pacificlawcenter.com/html/avandia.html
Are You Considering a Trasylol Lawsuit? Experienced Trasylol Lawyers in
If you're considering a Trasylol lawsuit in San Diego or elsewhere: Affected individuals can find out more from the experienced Trasylol lawyers at Pacific Law Center. pacificlawcenter.com/html/trasylol.html
Personal Injury Consultation with an Attorney in San Diego at Pacific
If you or a loved one has sustained a significant personal injury, an attorney may be able help. Home. Our Lawyers. Criminal Law " Criminal Court Cases " pacificlawcenter.com/html/personal_injury_consultation.html
San Diego drunk driving lawyers - Driver's license suspension help
If you have been charged with drunk driving, you may lose your drivers license. ... Home. Our Lawyers. Criminal Law " Criminal Court Cases " Defendant Rights " pacificlawcenter.com/html/drivers_license.html
Considering a Trileptal® Lawsuit? Experienced Trileptal® Lawyers
If you are considering a Trileptal® lawsuit, the knowledgeable and experienced Trileptal® lawyers of the San Diego-based Pacific Law Center can help you. pacificlawcenter.com/html/trileptal.html
Motorcycle Accident Lawyers in San Diego - Pacific Law Center
For information on motorcycle accident claims, speak with lawyers at our San Diego firm. Motorists are often careless and do not see motorcycles, and pacificlawcenter.com/html/motorcycle_accidents.html
San Diego Bankruptcy Attorney - Pacific Law Center
San Diego residents - do you need a bankruptcy attorney? Home. Our Lawyers. Criminal Law " Criminal Court Cases " Defendant Rights " pacificlawcenter.com/html/bankruptcy_attorney.html
Zelnorm® Side Effects Attorneys and Recall Lawyers – San Diego
Our Zelnorm® side effects attorneys and recall lawyers assist individuals in San Diego, Southern California, and throughout the United States in obtaining pacificlawcenter.com/html/zelnorm.html
Chapter 7 Bankruptcy - Attorney in San Diego, California - Pacific Law
Read about Chapter 7 bankruptcy, also known as liquidation or consumer bankruptcy. Home. Our Lawyers. Criminal Law " Criminal Court Cases " Defendant Rights " pacificlawcenter.com/html/ch_7.html
pacificlawcenter.com/blog
Ketek-Related Illness: Attorneys at Pacific Law Center in San Diego Can
The antibiotic Ketek® has been linked to severe injury and possibly life To view this, you need to install the Flash Player 7. Please go to here and download it. pacificlawcenter.com/html/ketek.html
ReNu Eye Solution with MoistureLoc - Infection and Recall Information
A ReNu with MoistureLoc® eye solution infection can result in blindness. To view this, you need to install the Flash Player 7. Please go to here and download it. pacificlawcenter.com/html/renu.html
Gadolinium Lawyer – Legal Information on Gadolinium Side Effects from
Gadolinium, as a lawyer from our office will tell you, is used in MRIs and MRAs and can have potentially deadly side effects for those with advanced kidney disease. pacificlawcenter.com/html/gadolinium.html
San Diego Zyprexa Lawyers - Pacific Law Center - Attorneys at Law
Learn about Zyprexa®, an anti-psychotic drug manufactured by Eli Lilly. To view this, you need to install the Flash Player 7. Please go to here and download it. pacificlawcenter.com/html/zyprexa.html
San Diego Bextra Lawyers - Pacific Law Center - Attorneys at Law
Read about the severe side effects associated with Accutane® law. To view this, you need to install the Flash Player 7. Please go to here and download it. pacificlawcenter.com/html/accutane.html
Our San Diego bankruptcy attorneys discuss the Chapter 7 and Chapter 13
Learn whether Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 bankruptcy is the best option for you. The choice of bankruptcy chapter depends on many factors that are specific to pacificlawcenter.com/html/which_chapter.html
Contact our San Diego personal injury attorneys at Pacific Law Center
Residents of San Diego County with wrongful death, DUI, or other legal cases can Home. Our Lawyers. Criminal Law " Criminal Court Cases " Defendant Rights " pacificlawcenter.com/html/contact.html
Mesothelioma and Asbestos Clients: Your Attorneys in San Diego, at the
The asbestos and mesothelioma attorneys of the San Diego offices of the Pacific Law Center can advise you regarding your legal rights and options if you've been pacificlawcenter.com/html/mesothelioma.html
Raintree Real Estate is an independent real estate brokerage, committed to providing outstanding service and value to buyers and sellers. We are widely recognized as the preeminent real estate company in Anytown. We are known for developing quality working relationships with our clientele; relationships based on respect, integrity, and trust. Raintree Real Estate is proud to have developed beneficial relationships with lenders, inspectors, contractors, and a wide range of housing professionals. We pride ourselves on building a solid foundation for your home to rest upon. Whether you are purchasing, selling, or both...we ensure that you have the support you need to make to make sound decisions and receive the best deal possible. We go the extra mile for you!
The agents at Raintree Real Estate take the time to listen to your needs and dreams. We work tirelessly to facilitate your goals without compromise. Raintree is committed to treating every client as if they are our #1 priority.
Whether you are buying, selling, or simply considering a move, we will be happy to speak with you.
Investment properties are our specialty!
Proudly serving Anytown for nearly a decade!
Raintree Real Estate
41344 N. Exploration Avenue
Anytown, Anystate 85008
(555) 555-1234
Fax (555) 555-1234
The Intelligent Choice!
KERRY STEIGERWALT'S
PACIFIC LAW CENTER IS A FRAUD
San-Diego-Police.com
ENTER HERE
The over 1 billion dollar FRAUD - Pacific Law Center
Please visit: San-Diego-Police.com and visit 100FreeAttorneys.com
I hired Pacific Law Center on August 31, 2006 for a criminal case while I was in a San Diego jail. For over a week they did nothing but take money, so I called and fired them.
On September 11, 2006 which was after I had fired Pacific Law Center, they came to jail to speak with me, and obviously I had refused to see the attorney.
On my next court date which was September 18, 2006 unknown to the court that I had fired Pacific Law Center, Pacific Law Center went to court and waved my rights to appear in court and kept themselves on record as my attorneys. Preosecutors were present in court.
On September 19, 2006 I did a cash bail out of jail, and I started to investigate Pacific Law Center.
I discovered that the owner of Pacific Law Center's name is a Mr.Jeffrey Phillips, and that he also owns a law firm in Phoenix, Arizona by the name of Phillips & Associates Law Firm.
I had found out that Pacific Law Center is a professional corporation in the State of California and it is listed with the Secretary of State of California as of January 14, 2003.
When Mr. Jeffrey Phillips filed with the Secretary of State of California on January 14, 2003 which was four months after he was found guilty on 20 complaints at the Arizona Supreme Court on September 13, 2002 related to his law firm, he listed himself as the agent to contact, with an address of 4025 Bayard Street, San Diego CA 92109, which means that he is a licensed California attorney and listed with The State Bar of California..
What Mr. Jeffrey Phillips did was he purchased a house in San Diego, California just so he can provide an San Diego address to the Secretary of State of California. Mr. Jeffrey Phillips never did live at this house, he lives in the State of Arizona.
I checked with The State Bar of California and found out that Mr. Jeffrey Phillips is not a licensed California attorney and Mr. Jeffrey Phillips is not listed with The State Bar of California.
I checked to see if other attorney's listed on their website pacificlawcenter.com are licensed California attorneys and I discovered that there are more employees listed with Pacific Law Center as attorney's and they are not licensed California attorney's and are not listed with The State Bar of California, which one of them is a Mr.John A. Schill.
Pacific Law Center started as a fraud, and still is a fraud due to the fact that evidence shows of coverups.
Pacific Law Center and their conspirators filed multiple lawsuits against me in order to keep me silent, and the government agreed from City, County, State and Federal.
Well over 100,000 people from San Diego County have hired Pacific Law Center for criminal cases. My focus is mostly on the criminal cases that Pacific Law Center was and is involved in. 100,000 people is a low ball figure.
Pacific Law Center charged me $9000 and it was not a felony case.
There are several customers that have paid Pacific Law Center well over $150,000 for their criminal case.
So lets assume that Pacific Law Center charged $10,000 per customer of 100,000 criminal cases, that would add up to $1,000,000,000 (One Billion dollars), and this is the absolute low ball numbers. It is the same thing that Mr. Jeffrey Phillips is doing in the State of Arizona.
Every single customer of Pacific Law Center since January 14, 2003 is entitled to a full refund and to have their criminal cases reviewed and more than likely have their cases overturned and thrown out. This is one of the many main reasons that the government (District Attorney) does not want to recognize this ongoing fraud, because they will have to go through over 100,000 criminal cases and it will cost the government hundreds of millions of dollars. Pacific Law Center has already started to destroy thier customers files from 2003 and 2004.
The media is well aware of this ongoing fraud, but because they get paid millions of dollars for advertisements from Pacific Law Center they have not only chosen to stay silent, but to help Pacific Law Center to keep me silent, which includes misleading the public through their reportings. 10news.com did nothing, including other local media stations. They all want a piece of the billion dollar scam.
On July 12, 2007 a U.S. Federal Judge Mr.Larry Alan Burns had me placed in a federal jail on behalf of Pacific Law Center.
On July 10, 2007 Just two days before I was placed in jail for writing, I recieved an e-mail from 10news.com, and they 10news.com called me two times on July 10, 2007 and left messages to give me the impresion that the media will expose the Pacific Law Center fraud.
On July 23, 2007 ACLU filed papers on my behalf in the U.S. Federal Court, and immediately on that same day Mr. Jeffrey Phillips took his name off of the agent to contact filed with the Secretary of State of California. He placed the name of a Mr. Alan Spears as the agent of contact, and himself as the CEO. See documents below.
Picture below taken from 10news.com website: The guy on top is Mr. Jeffrey Phillips, and the guy in the second row to the right is Mr.John A. Schill whom is a main player in this ongoing fraud and coverup.